Posted on

Whistleblower alleges White House coverup – CNNPolitics

SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images
SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images

More than half the US House of Representatives have now said they support an impeachment investigation into President Trump.

The numbers: There are at least 219 House Democrats — according to a CNN count — who publicly stated support for impeachment proceedings. Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan, a former Republican who has since become an independent, has also called for an impeachment investigation, bringing the total number of representatives to 220, or just over half of the 435-member chamber.

Why this matters: Reaching the halfway mark on this issue is a significant development as a majority of the House would be needed to vote to impeach the President in order to send the process to the Senate.

But remember: However, CNN’s count includes many Democrats who say they support an impeachment investigation but are still waiting for the results of the probe before deciding whether to finally vote to impeach Trump.

Even if the House could pass the vote, it likely would go nowhere in the Republican-controlled Senate, one of many reasons the issue has been politically divisive among Democrats and a large part of why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had for months avoided calling Democratic investigations an impeachment inquiry.

See the full list of Democrats supporting the inquiry here.

Posted on

Acting spy chief tells Congress the whistleblower did the right thing

Maguire repeatedly defended his handling of the complaint, telling lawmakers he followed the law in an “unprecedented” situation despite claims to the contrary by Democrats that he infringed on their right to review the allegations.

The complaint states that several White House officials were “deeply disturbed” by Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President
Volodymyr Zelensky and tried to “lock down” all records of the phone call, especially the word-for-word transcript produced by the White House.

Maguire said during his testimony he did not have the authority to waive the executive privilege that covered the conversation with Ukraine’s President and would not say whether he discussed the complaint with Trump.

“My conversations with the President, because I’m the director of national intelligence, are privileged, and it would be inappropriate for me, because it would destroy my relationship with the President in intelligence matters, to divulge any of my conversations with the President of the United States,” Maguire said responding to a question from Rep. Jim Himes, a Connecticut Democrat.

Justice Department ignored additional allegations when considering if complaint could be shared with CongressJustice Department ignored additional allegations when considering if complaint could be shared with Congress

But in a tense exchange with Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell of California, Maguire conceded that “there is an allegation of a coverup.”

“But right now, all we have is an allegation — an allegation with second hand information from a whistleblower. I have no knowledge on whether or not that is true and accurate statement,” he said.

When asked later in the hearing if Trump asked him to disclose the identity of the whistleblower, Maguire told lawmakers,” I can tell you emphatically, no.”

He also said no one else within the White House or DOJ asked him to identify the whistleblower.

White House consulted after complaint

Initially, Maguire seemed to waver about the chronology of events related to
his handling of the complaint but ultimately told lawmakers on the House Intelligence Committee that his office did seek guidance from the White House before raising the issue with the Office of Legal Counsel and Department of Justice, which advised he was not legally bound to provide it to the committee.

“Such calls are typically subject to executive privilege, as a result we consulted with the White House counsel’s office and were advised that much of the information of the complaint was in fact subject to executive privilege,” Maguire said. “A privilege that I do not have the authority to waive. Because of that we were unable to immediately share the details of the complaint with this committee.”

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence has provided a redacted version to Congress that members can bring to an open hearing, a spokesperson said.

The anticipation ahead of Maguire’s testimony was also amplified by the White House’s decision to
release a transcript of Trump’s July 25 phone call with the leader of Ukraine that shows the President repeatedly pressed his counterpart to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son. There is no evidence of wrongdoing by either Joe or Hunter Biden.
Washington Post: Acting spy chief threatened to resign if White House restricted his testimonyWashington Post: Acting spy chief threatened to resign if White House restricted his testimony

The conversation between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is included in the whistleblower complaint, a source familiar with the situation said last week, a revelation that only raised more questions in the ongoing controversy.

On Tuesday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared the President had betrayed his oath of office and announced
she is opening a formal impeachment inquiry, a move that has raised the stakes of this week’s events.

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, started the hearing by accusing Trump of betraying his oath of office and compromising US national security for Trump’s “personal, political benefit,” referring to the conduct outlined in the call transcript released Wednesday.

“It forces us to confront the remedy the founders provided for such a flagrant abuse of office: impeachment. Now this matter would not have come to the attention of our committee or the nation’s attention without the courage of a single person- the whistleblower,” he said.

GOP members question whistleblower’s claim

Republicans, however, keyed in to the fact that the whistleblower acknowledged they did not have firsthand knowledge of most of the events described in the complaint.

“I was not a direct witness to most of the events described,” the whistleblower wrote, noting that they were aware of details in the complaint pertaining to Trump’s July 25 phone call with the Ukrainian President because of “White House officials with direct knowledge of the call.”

But the public now has a way to test the accuracy of at least part of the whistleblower’s complaint by comparing the details related to that call to the transcript released by the White House Wednesday. By all appearances, the information is consistent.

‘);$vidEndSlate.removeClass(‘video__end-slate–inactive’).addClass(‘video__end-slate–active’);}};CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === true) ? true : false;var configObj = {thumb: ‘none’,video: ‘politics/2019/09/26/devin-nunes-joseph-maguire-leak-source-bts-vpx.cnn’,width: ‘100%’,height: ‘100%’,section: ‘domestic’,profile: ‘expansion’,network: ‘cnn’,markupId: ‘body-text_31’,theoplayer: {allowNativeFullscreen: true},adsection: ‘const-article-inpage’,frameWidth: ‘100%’,frameHeight: ‘100%’,posterImageOverride: {“mini”:{“width”:220,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190926105922-devin-nunes-joseph-maguire-split-09262019-small-169.jpg”,”height”:124},”xsmall”:{“width”:307,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190926105922-devin-nunes-joseph-maguire-split-09262019-medium-plus-169.jpg”,”height”:173},”small”:{“width”:460,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190926105922-devin-nunes-joseph-maguire-split-09262019-large-169.jpg”,”height”:259},”medium”:{“width”:780,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190926105922-devin-nunes-joseph-maguire-split-09262019-exlarge-169.jpg”,”height”:438},”large”:{“width”:1100,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190926105922-devin-nunes-joseph-maguire-split-09262019-super-169.jpg”,”height”:619},”full16x9″:{“width”:1600,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190926105922-devin-nunes-joseph-maguire-split-09262019-full-169.jpg”,”height”:900},”mini1x1″:{“width”:120,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190926105922-devin-nunes-joseph-maguire-split-09262019-small-11.jpg”,”height”:120}}},autoStartVideo = false,isVideoReplayClicked = false,callbackObj,containerEl,currentVideoCollection = [],currentVideoCollectionId = ”,isLivePlayer = false,mediaMetadataCallbacks,mobilePinnedView = null,moveToNextTimeout,mutePlayerEnabled = false,nextVideoId = ”,nextVideoUrl = ”,turnOnFlashMessaging = false,videoPinner,videoEndSlateImpl;if (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === false) {autoStartVideo = false;if (autoStartVideo === true) {if (turnOnFlashMessaging === true) {autoStartVideo = false;containerEl = jQuery(document.getElementById(configObj.markupId));CNN.VideoPlayer.showFlashSlate(containerEl);} else {CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = true;}}}configObj.autostart = CNN.Features.enableAutoplayBlock ? false : autoStartVideo;CNN.VideoPlayer.setPlayerProperties(configObj.markupId, autoStartVideo, isLivePlayer, isVideoReplayClicked, mutePlayerEnabled);CNN.VideoPlayer.setFirstVideoInCollection(currentVideoCollection, configObj.markupId);videoEndSlateImpl = new CNN.VideoEndSlate(‘body-text_31’);function findNextVideo(currentVideoId) {var i,vidObj;if (currentVideoId && jQuery.isArray(currentVideoCollection) && currentVideoCollection.length > 0) {for (i = 0; i 0) {videoEndSlateImpl.showEndSlateForContainer();if (mobilePinnedView) {mobilePinnedView.disable();}}}}callbackObj = {onPlayerReady: function (containerId) {var playerInstance,containerClassId = ‘#’ + containerId;CNN.VideoPlayer.handleInitialExpandableVideoState(containerId);CNN.VideoPlayer.handleAdOnCVPVisibilityChange(containerId, CNN.pageVis.isDocumentVisible());if (CNN.Features.enableMobileWebFloatingPlayer &&Modernizr &&(Modernizr.phone || Modernizr.mobile || Modernizr.tablet) &&CNN.VideoPlayer.getLibraryName(containerId) === ‘fave’ &&jQuery(containerClassId).parents(‘.js-pg-rail-tall__head’).length > 0 &&CNN.contentModel.pageType === ‘article’) {playerInstance = FAVE.player.getInstance(containerId);mobilePinnedView = new CNN.MobilePinnedView({element: jQuery(containerClassId),enabled: false,transition: CNN.MobileWebFloatingPlayer.transition,onPin: function () {playerInstance.hideUI();},onUnpin: function () {playerInstance.showUI();},onPlayerClick: function () {if (mobilePinnedView) {playerInstance.enterFullscreen();playerInstance.showUI();}},onDismiss: function() {CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer.disable();playerInstance.pause();}});/* Storing pinned view on CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer So that all players can see the single pinned player */CNN.Videx = CNN.Videx || {};CNN.Videx.mobile = CNN.Videx.mobile || {};CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer = mobilePinnedView;}if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (jQuery(containerClassId).parents(‘.js-pg-rail-tall__head’).length) {videoPinner = new CNN.VideoPinner(containerClassId);videoPinner.init();} else {CNN.VideoPlayer.hideThumbnail(containerId);}}},onContentEntryLoad: function(containerId, playerId, contentid, isQueue) {CNN.VideoPlayer.showSpinner(containerId);},onContentPause: function (containerId, playerId, videoId, paused) {if (mobilePinnedView) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleMobilePinnedPlayerStates(containerId, paused);}},onContentMetadata: function (containerId, playerId, metadata, contentId, duration, width, height) {var endSlateLen = jQuery(document.getElementById(containerId)).parent().find(‘.js-video__end-slate’).eq(0).length;CNN.VideoSourceUtils.updateSource(containerId, metadata);if (endSlateLen > 0) {videoEndSlateImpl.fetchAndShowRecommendedVideos(metadata);}},onAdPlay: function (containerId, cvpId, token, mode, id, duration, blockId, adType) {/* Dismissing the pinnedPlayer if another video players plays an Ad */CNN.VideoPlayer.dismissMobilePinnedPlayer(containerId);clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);videoPinner.animateDown();}}},onAdPause: function (containerId, playerId, token, mode, id, duration, blockId, adType, instance, isAdPause) {if (mobilePinnedView) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleMobilePinnedPlayerStates(containerId, isAdPause);}},onTrackingFullscreen: function (containerId, PlayerId, dataObj) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleFullscreenChange(containerId, dataObj);if (mobilePinnedView &&typeof dataObj === ‘object’ &&FAVE.Utils.os === ‘iOS’ && !dataObj.fullscreen) {jQuery(document).scrollTop(mobilePinnedView.getScrollPosition());playerInstance.hideUI();}},onContentPlay: function (containerId, cvpId, event) {var playerInstance,prevVideoId;if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘restoreEpicAds’);}clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);videoPinner.animateDown();}}},onContentReplayRequest: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);var $endSlate = jQuery(document.getElementById(containerId)).parent().find(‘.js-video__end-slate’).eq(0);if ($endSlate.length > 0) {$endSlate.removeClass(‘video__end-slate–active’).addClass(‘video__end-slate–inactive’);}}}},onContentBegin: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (mobilePinnedView) {mobilePinnedView.enable();}/* Dismissing the pinnedPlayer if another video players plays a video. */CNN.VideoPlayer.dismissMobilePinnedPlayer(containerId);CNN.VideoPlayer.mutePlayer(containerId);if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘removeEpicAds’);}CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoSourceUtils.clearSource(containerId);jQuery(document).triggerVideoContentStarted();},onContentComplete: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘restoreFreewheel’);}navigateToNextVideo(contentId, containerId);},onContentEnd: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(false);}}},onCVPVisibilityChange: function (containerId, cvpId, visible) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleAdOnCVPVisibilityChange(containerId, visible);}};if (typeof configObj.context !== ‘string’ || configObj.context.length 0) {configObj.adsection = window.ssid;}CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === true) ? true : false;CNN.VideoPlayer.getLibrary(configObj, callbackObj, isLivePlayer);});CNN.INJECTOR.scriptComplete(‘videodemanddust’);

“After reviewing the complaint, and the inspector general’s transmittal letter, the office of legal counsel determined that the complaint’s allegations do not meet the statutory requirement definition (of) legal, urgent concern, and found that I was not legally required to transmit the material to our oversight committee,” he added.

Last week, Maguire refused to comply with a deadline to hand over a whistleblower complaint to the House Intelligence Committee that had been deemed by the intelligence community inspector general to be “credible and urgent,” a conclusion that drove his push to provide Congress with the details and refer the matter to the Justice Department for consideration of criminality.

Maguire suggested during his testimony that he understood the importance of the complaint itself.

“I realized … full and well the importance of the allegation,” Maguire said, adding later, “when I saw that, I anticipated having to sit in front of some committee some time to discuss it.”

This story has been updated and will continue to update with developments Thursday.

Posted on

Live updates: Trump whistleblowers complaint and Joseph Maguires testimony – CNNPolitics

Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire would not say if he spoke with President Trump about the whistleblower complaint, noting that his conversations with the President are privileged.

Democratic Rep. Jim Himes asked Maguire about his conversations with Trump. Here’s how the exchange unfolded:

Himes: Did you ever speak to the President about this complaint? 

Maguire: “My conversations with the President, because I am the Director of National Intelligence, are privileged, and it would be inappropriate for me because it would destroy my relationship with the President in intelligence matters to divulge any of my conversations with the President of the united States.”

Himes: “But, just so we can be clear for the record, you are not denying that you spoke to the President about this complaint?” 

Maguire: “What I am saying, congressman, is that I will not divulge privileged conversations that I have as the Director of National Intelligence with the President.”

Posted on

Whistleblowers complaint is coming – CNNPolitics

During his testimony, the acting spy chief said the case that they’re discussing today is “unique and unprecedented” compared to other whistleblower cases he is aware of.

Here was the full exchange:

Maguire: I want to say once again, I believe that the situation we have and why we’re here this morning is because this case is unique and unprecedented.

Nunes: So why are cases normally not handled out in the public?

Maguire: All the other cases that came before either this committee or the senate committee, whether or not they met the criteria of urgent concern were forwarded because they involved members of the intelligence community who were, in fact, in organizations underneath the DNI’s authority and responsibility. This one just didn’t come that way because it involved a member — an individual who is not a member of the intelligence community or an organization underneath the authority of the DNI. So this one is different from all others in the past that I am aware of.

Posted on

Live updates: Trump whistleblowers complaint is out – CNNPolitics

Alex Edelman/Getty Images
Alex Edelman/Getty Images

More than half the US House of Representatives have now said they support the impeachment investigation into President Trump. 

The numbers: There are at least 217 House Democrats – according to a CNN count – who publicly stated support for impeachment proceedings. Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan, a former Republican who has since become an independent, has also called for an impeachment investigation, bringing the total number of representatives to 218, or just over half of the 435-member chamber.

Why this matters: Reaching the halfway mark on this issue is a significant development as a majority of the House would be needed to vote to impeach the President in order to send the process to the Senate.

But remember: CNN’s count includes many Democrats who say they support an impeachment investigation but are still waiting for the results of the probe before deciding whether to finally vote to impeach Trump.

Even if the House could pass the vote, it likely would go nowhere in the Republican-controlled Senate, one of many reasons the issue has been politically divisive among Democrats and a large part of why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had for months avoided calling Democratic investigations an impeachment inquiry.  

Posted on

Whistleblower complaint about Trump delivered to Congress

Democrats reading the document, which is available to lawmakers in a secure facility, say it backs up their commitment to their investigation. The move comes just hours after the White House released a rough transcript of a July 25 phone call that shows the President repeatedly pressed the leader of Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son.

“I found the allegations deeply disturbing,” said House Intelligence chairman Adam Schiff, D-California. “I also found them deeply credible and I understand why the inspector general found them credible.”

Illinois Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, called the whistleblower complaint “troubling, disturbing” and “reinforces our concerns.”

“Having read the documents in there, I’m even more worried about what happened than I was when I read the memorandum of the conversation,” said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.

Rep. Eric Swalwell, also a Democrat on the House committee, would not comment on the contents of the complaint but said it gives Congress new leads to investigate and heightens the push towards impeachment.

The conversation between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is included in the whistleblower complaint, a source familiar with the situation said last week, a revelation only raised more questions in the ongoing controversy.

Trump has downplayed the significance of the complaint, claiming the whistleblower is partisan and his conversations with foreign leaders are “appropriate.”

During a news conference in New York, the President claimed the individual — who has not been identified — “didn’t have any first class or first rate or second tier information from what I understand.”

Trump said he has told House Republicans he wants “full transparency on the so-called whistleblower information,” but continued to peddle conspiracy theories about the Bidens and Ukraine.

Most lawmakers declined to comment on the complaint.

“I’m not going to talk about classified information, you know better than that,” said Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican.

Sen. Angus King, an independent from Maine, said he still has some “open questions” so he’d rather not comment further.

Sen. Richard Burr, the Republican chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said he has started to read the document but declined to give his initial thoughts.

One Republican who did speak to reporters,
Rep. John Ratcliffe, said the best evidence he saw was the transcript of Trump’s call with the Ukrainian President “as opposed to an accounting of the conversation from someone who wasn’t there.”

“It provided information beyond the transcript,” he said of the complaint, but wouldn’t weigh in on whether that information is detrimental or beneficial to Trump.

The intelligence community inspector general last week suggested that the whistleblower complaint that triggered the Ukraine-Trump drama, raised concerns about multiple actions, sources told CNN.

However, the inspector general — who spoke at a closed-door briefing last week — would not say if those instances involved Trump, the sources said.

Trump claims he put 'no pressure' on ZelenskyTrump claims he put 'no pressure' on Zelensky

On Thursday, acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire will appear before the House Intelligence Committee to discuss the issue. He will also brief members of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

This story is breaking and will be updated.

CNN’s Kevin Liptak, Manu Raju, Haley Byrd and Nick Neville contributed to this report.

Posted on

Which drink is best for hydration? Hint: It isnt water

The researchers found that while water —
both still and sparkling –does a pretty good job of quickly hydrating the body, beverages with a little bit of sugar, fat or protein do an even better job of keeping us hydrated for longer.

The reason has to do with how our bodies respond to beverages, according to Ronald Maughan, a professor at St. Andrews’ School of Medicine and the study’s author. One factor is the volume of a given drink: The more you drink, the faster the drink empties from your stomach and gets absorbed into the bloodstream, where it can dilute the body’s fluids and hydrate you.

The other factor affecting how well a beverage hydrates relates to a drink’s nutrient composition. For example, milk was found to be even more hydrating than plain water because it contains the sugar lactose, some protein and some fat, all of which help to slow the emptying of fluid from the stomach and keep hydration happening over a longer period of time.

Milk also has sodium, which acts like a sponge and holds onto water in the body and results in less urine produced.

The same can be said for oral rehydration solutions that are used to treat diarrhea. Those contain small amounts of sugar,
as well as sodium and potassium, which can also help promote water retention in the body.

“This study tells us much of what we already knew: Electrolytes — like sodium and potassium — contribute to better hydration, while calories in beverages result in slower gastric emptying and therefore slower release of urination,” said Melissa Majumdar, a registered dietitian, personal trainer and spokeswoman for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics who was not involved in the study.

Sugar in moderation

But here’s where it gets tricky: Beverages with more concentrated sugars, such as fruit juices or colas, are not necessarily as hydrating as their lower-sugar cousins. They may spend a little more time in the stomach and empty more slowly compared to plain water, but once these beverages enter the small intestine their high concentration of sugars gets diluted during a physiological process called osmosis. This process in effect “pulls” water from the body into the small intestine to dilute the sugars these beverages contain. And technically, anything inside the intestine is outside your body.

Want to live longer? You may want to ditch these drinksWant to live longer? You may want to ditch these drinks

Juice and soda are not only less hydrating, but offer extra sugars and calories that won’t fill us up as much as solid foods, explained Majumdar. If the choice is between soda and water for hydration, go with water every time. After all, our kidneys and liver depend on water to get rid of toxins in our bodies, and water also plays a key role in maintaining skin’s elasticity and suppleness. It’s the cheapest moisturizer you’ll find.

While staying hydrated is important — doing so keeps our joints lubricated, helps prevent infections, and carries nutrients to our cells — in most situations people don’t need to worry too much about how hydrating their beverages are.

“If you’re thirsty, your body will tell you to drink more,” Maughan said. But for athletes training seriously in warm conditions with high sweat losses, or for someone whose cognitive function may be negatively impacted by working long hours without beverage breaks, hydration becomes a critical issue.

Can beer and lattes keep me hydrated?

Alcohol acts as a diuretic, which causes you to pass more urine, so when it comes to alcoholic beverages hydration will depend on a beverage’s total volume. “Beer would result in less water loss than whiskey, because you are ingesting more fluid with beer,” Maughan said. “Strong alcoholic drinks will dehydrate, dilute alcoholic drinks will not.”

What to drink to help you sleepWhat to drink to help you sleep
When it comes to coffee, how well your java hydrates you will depend on the amount of caffeine you consume. A regular coffee with about 80 milligrams of caffeine —
roughly what you would find in 12 oz. of Folgers’ house blend — would be pretty much as hydrating as water, according to Maughan’s research.
Consuming more than 300mg of caffeine,
or about 2-4 cups of coffee, could cause you to lose excess fluid as the caffeine causes a mild, short-term diuretic effect. This is more likely to happen with someone who doesn’t typically consume caffeine, and it could be offset by adding a tablespoon or two of milk to your cup of joe.

Lisa Drayer is a nutritionist, an author and a CNN health and nutrition contributor.

Posted on

Live updates: House launches Trump impeachment inquiry – CNNPolitics

A source close to the White House who routinely speaks with Trump says the President does not want to be impeached.

Despite his comments that he believes the process might help him politically, Trump, according to the source, has worried about the possibility of being impeached for nearly a year, dating back to the weeks that followed the November 2018 midterms when Democrats won the House.

His decisions to quickly authorize the release of the call transcript, as well as the whistleblower complaint, are signs of Trump’s wariness of the potential of entering the history books as an impeached president, the source added. 

 A White House official said a declassification process is currently underway for releasing the whistleblower complaint which is expected to be handed over to Congress by Thursday.

Posted on

Inside the tangled web of Trump officials and Ukraines Zelensky

Nevertheless, on September 1, there he was, leaning over a vase of white flowers to listen as the Ukrainian President vowed to “beat corruption” and enact new reforms.

Now, Pence finds himself among the numerous administration officials thrust into the middle of another controversy involving the President and foreign political influence, a familiar but uncomfortable predicament for many of Trump’s associates as they near the three-year-mark of a scandal-plagued presidency.

Over the course of the past five months, US officials have raised corruption issues with Zelensky and his aides repeatedly as they took measure of a new leader in a country long plagued by crooked government and pay-for-play politics.

But, because of public and private urging from Trump and his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, officials also reckoned with how to raise allegations involving the son of Vice President Joe Biden, who held a board position at a Ukrainian energy company and Trump insisted should be investigated. There is no evidence of wrongdoing by either Joe or Hunter Biden.

The issue exploded this week as Trump sought to bolster his foreign agenda at the United Nations. In nearly every photo opportunity, he confronted questions about the issue, including whether it was related to his decision to temporarily withhold US military aid.

Defiant, Trump sought to explain his decision as a desire to force Europe to pay more. In explaining himself, however, Trump brought his various underlings to the fray.

“I made that loud and clear. I told that to Mick Mulvaney, I told it to a lot of people — where’s Mick? — wherever he is,” Trump said, referring to his acting chief of staff.

“I told it to a lot of different people. I told it to Mike, I told it to — two Mikes. I told it to Steve. I said it to Wilbur Ross,” he added, referencing his vice president and Secretaries of State, Treasury and Commerce. “I keep asking the same question. Why is it that the United States is always paying these foreign countries?”

It’s a familiar complaint that nonetheless has taken new life this week amid revelations Trump repeatedly raised the issue of Biden and his son in a late-July phone call with Zelensky. That has spurred Democrats to open formal impeachment proceedings and has raised questions about who in the administration was privy to Trump’s decision-making as the events in question unfolded.

Asked this week about the controversy, Trump’s Cabinet aides have sought to turn the blame back on Biden and shrugged off suggestions of impropriety.

“He mentioned Vice President Biden and his son in the context of us wanting to see honest government,” Pence said in an interview on Fox News. “That’s exactly what the American taxpayer would expect.”

Evaluating a new leader

Ukrainian President says his conversations with Trump are 'private and confidential'Ukrainian President says his conversations with Trump are 'private and confidential'

Still, before the call took place, administration officials and Trump allies had spent months taking stock of the new Ukrainian leader.

Trump first spoke with Zelensky by phone in April, shortly after his election, to congratulate him on his victory. In a description of that call, the White House said Trump did raise a desire to “root out corruption” in Ukraine — a key issue that the White House readout of the July phone call did not include.

In the ensuing months, officials worked to make inroads with Zelensky’s administration, including then-National Security Adviser John Bolton and the US Special Representative for Ukraine Kurt Volker.

At the same time, Giuliani was embarking upon his effort to convince Kiev to investigate Hunter Biden and his business dealings in Ukraine — an effort that quickly caught the attention of the President.

Trump himself was not initially interested in engaging with Zelensky, officials familiar with the matter said. Instead, he viewed Ukraine was a corrupt country that wasn’t committed to reform, according to people familiar with his thinking at the time.

His phone call — and a planned meeting with Zelensky on Wednesday — came after months of back-and-forth between Trump and his advisers, who have worked to convince him that engaging the new Ukrainian leader is worth his time and effort for national security reasons.

During a meeting between Zelensky and Volker in early July — ahead of Trump’s second phone call with the Ukrainian President — Zelensky referenced Giuliani in a joking manner, according to a source familiar with the discussion.

The Biden allegations were not central to that discussion, which took place in Toronto, as it mainly focused on how to urge the Ukrainians to make positive policy decisions — namely in rooting out corruption, and dealing with the Russians.

Giuliani’s role

Trump's interest in Ukraine ramped up as Giuliani pressed on Biden claimsTrump's interest in Ukraine ramped up as Giuliani pressed on Biden claims

As the US laid out those priorities, Zelensky joked about the hardship of getting lawyers involved. That’s when he playfully referenced Giuliani, acknowledging that his Trump administration interlockers where not responsible for the President’s persistent personal attorney.

According to press reports, Volker said on the sidelines of the meetings that Ukraine has a “judiciary that has been subject to political influences from various directions for a long time” — an allusion to the corruption issues that American officials have long encouraged Ukraine to solve.

It wasn’t long before Ukrainian officials visited Washington for key meetings at the White House, State Department and Pentagon, which ultimately led up to Trump’s July 25 phone call.

People familiar with the matter said Bolton and other US officials who met with the senior Ukrainian official in early July did not discuss the Biden matter, either. But the issue was known, and colored the talks.

“That was a bizarre situation, but it all seemed to be dealt with in Giuliani track,” a person familiar with the meetings said. “It was out there, but it was being handled by Giuliani. We did not deal with that because he (Giuliani) was talking about it and saying he was a private citizen.”

In the following weeks, it was Volker who helped arrange a meeting between Giuliani and a Zelensky aide, during which the former New York City mayor encouraged an investigation into the Biden issue. Volker connected the aide with Giuliani at the request of Zelensky’s presidential adviser, the State Department said. The request was a markedly different approach than Zelensky laughing off Giuliani’s role just weeks before.

Volker was intent on trying to get the Biden issue off the table, the person familiar with the matter said, eager to remove the issue from bilateral conversations between the US and Ukraine. His steps toward arranging the meeting between Giuliani and a Zelensky aide were meant to hand the issue off to a non-government interlocutor so that administration officials could focus on the many other issues between the countries.

But given that Trump himself had raised the Biden matter with Zelensky in his July 25 phone call, he inserted it squarely in the middle of the US-Ukraine relationship.

Vague answers

Former intelligence chief Dan Coats feels 'so bad' for successor as Ukraine drama ramps upFormer intelligence chief Dan Coats feels 'so bad' for successor as Ukraine drama ramps up

While Volker, a State Department official, facilitated that meeting, Pompeo would not address the role his department played in a round of interviews on Sunday. Pompeo also declined to give a direct answer when asked if he had ever asked Zelensky to open an investigation into Biden or not. Instead, he spoke in vague terms about the US-Ukraine official dialogue.

“I’ve talked to the foreign minister now a couple of times. We talk about the important relationship between our two countries and how we can make Ukraine stronger and have great economic commerce between our two great nations,” Pompeo said.

By the time Pence was sitting in a Warsaw hotel conference room across from Zelensky in September, an intelligence whistleblower had already filed a complaint centered on Trump’s behavior toward Ukraine.

A day later, Pence was questioned by reporters whether the issue involving Biden’s son arose in his meeting. He said it did not — but quickly turned to the issue of corruption.

“As President Trump had me make clear, we have great concerns about issues of corruption. And, fortunately, President Zelensky was elected decisively on an anti-corruption message,” Pence said, adding later: “To invest additional taxpayer in Ukraine, the President wants to be assured that those resources are truly making their way to the kind of investments that will contribute to security and stability in Ukraine. And that’s an expectation the American people have and the President has expressed very clearly.”

Zelensky, meanwhile, is visiting the United States just as his conversations with Trump prompt a historic political crisis.

He seemed unfazed on Tuesday.

“I expect us to have awesome relations with the United States. I expect us to invite Donald Trump to visit Ukraine. I would like the leaders of the countries to come and see how great Ukraine is. One should believe not the words, but the eyes,” he said in a Facebook video.

Asked by CNN later if it was his understanding that the aid for Ukraine and investigation into the Bidens was linked, Zelensky simply responded that his conversations with the President are “private and confidential.”

When asked if he wanted the transcript of the call to be released, Zelensky said only: “We’ll see.”

CNN’s Alex Marquardt contributed to this story.

Posted on

Live updates: Trump impeachment inquiry is coming – CNNPolitics

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Democrat from New York, told reporters this afternoon that she believes President Trump has committed “several impeachable offenses.”

On Trump’s remarks that he did order his aides to withhold aid from Ukraine, Ocasio-Cortez, an often-vocal proponent for impeachment, said: “What he has already admitted to is an impeachable offense.”

Asked if she thought the caucus was being too slow by waiting this long to open the impeachment inquiry, Ocasio-Cortez said, “Honestly, at this point it doesn’t matter. We’re moving forward with it now.”